I was moving right along in this Joomla site development.

Installed Joomla
Installed Community Builder Stable 1.1
Installed Fireboard 1.0.3
Installed GroupJive 1.6

Began integration:

got all the way to the point of Fireboard integration with GroupJive.
followed directions in readme_fireboard.txt

When testing out integration, click on menu link to Fireboard and get the following errors just above the Fireboard forum:

Warning: main() [function.main]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/includes/gj.core.groups.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (/var/www/vhosts/meandmyfolks.com/httpdocs:/tmp) in /var/www/vhosts/meandmyfolks.com/httpdocs/por...ive/groupjive_jb.php on line 5

Warning: main(includes/gj.core.groups.php) [function.main]: failed to open stream: Operation not permitted in /var/www/vhosts/meandmyfolks.com/httpdocs/por...ive/groupjive_jb.php on line 5

Warning: main() [function.include]: Failed opening 'includes/gj.core.groups.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:' in /var/www/vhosts/meandmyfolks.com/httpdocs/por...ive/groupjive_jb.php on line 5

Any ideas where I went wrong.

Don't really see any Fireboard errors there. Have you checked the GJ support forums?

I think you're right but since I don't remember this error appearing until after I performed mods to the /components/com_fireboard/fireboard.php file, I thought mabey someone here may have experience the same problem. I was hoping someone had already performed steps in the readme_fireboard.txt being distributed as instructions to the fireboard/groupjive integration. I also only saw errors that were pointing me to GroupJive.

When I posted here, I had already posted the same request for help on the GroupJive site at: www.groupjive.org/component/option,com_f...tid,47/id,3354/#3353

After a while I thought it may be a good idea to look for help in multiple places.

If this thought was improper judgement or bad netiquette, I apologize and will patiently wait to see if someone from the GroupJive site can help



With all respect
Frank

No. It was the right thinking. I was just wondering if you tried to attack the problem on both fronts.