Best of joomla gives you news, joomla templates, tutorials and websites about Joomla , FireBoard and FireMessage official page.
| No account yet?   |
The FireBoard forum component development is still going on. In order to get better, FireBoard will be moved from the Best of Joomla website.
During this transition period, the forum in Best of Joomla will be closed to new posts.
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
FireBoard Manual Latest release discussions Download FireBoard
Users have no access after migration to j! 1.5 (1 viewing) (1) Guest
TOPIC: Users have no access after migration to j! 1.5
#44173
Users have no access after migration to j! 1.5 10 Months, 4 Weeks ago  
I have tried to upgrade my page recently.

This is what I did:

I used the migration script thing for joomla to transfer content and users.
Then I exported all the old tables beginning with jos_fb from the old site, installad FB on the new site and imported the tables.

It seems to work ok, except for the fact that anybody who is not an administrator or better,
get this message when trying to view the forum: "You do not have access to this Forum!"

If a user is upgraded to super admin and tries to view the forum it works - even when changed back to "manager" or "registered".
If that user has not accesed the forum before being downgraded again, it doesn't work.

Now, I don't want to make every user a super admin, so is there another way to make the forum visible?

I have compared a the original sql dump, with a dump of thethe one where I have performed the procedure described above with two users, and the only significant difference that I can find is in the `jos_fb_sessions` table.

The sql command begins like this:
[code:1]INSERT INTO `jos_fb_sessions` (`userid`, `allowed`, `lasttime`, `readtopics`, `currvisit`) VALUES[/code:1]

and beneath that is an entry for each user.
Most of the look like this:
(63, 'na', 1202635333, '704', 1202679868),
but after I changed changed the user to super admin, accessed the forum and changed it back, it looks like this:
(63, '10,11,5,3,4,9,13,12', 1202679868, '699', 1203018925),

I notice that the field called 'allowed' is now filled with number.
Should I put '10,11,5,3,4,9,13,12' in the `allowed` field for every user or is there a proper way to do things?
Lowkey (User)
Blah
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 10
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Logged Logged
 
 
Go to top